The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the total of kilometres which passengers travelled by 5 different kinds of transportation in the UK over a period of 10 years, namely bicycle, motorbike, air, bus, rail.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that the total kilometres which passengers went in 1990 was 15 times as high as that of bicycle in the same time. It is clear to see that while the passengers kilometres travelled by bicycle and motorbike decreased over a period shown, the others experienced a reverse trend.
Looking at the graph, it is clear to see that the total kilometres which people in the UK travelled was the highest during 10 years, from 100 billions to 110 billion. By 2000, the number of kilometres in rail had experienced a dramatic increase, with a jump of about 10 billion. This figure in 2000 was equalled that of bus in the same time, at around 50 billion.
When it comes to the others, there was a slight decrease of under 1 billion in the number of kilometres which people in the UK travelled by bicycle. A similar trend could be seen for motorbike, with a drop to 6 billion in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The table below gives the information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004 67
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57213930348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68220578361 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6547601178 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167625973021 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790551097922 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452598403661 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115876399021 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416017684979 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.