The bar chart below shows the percentage of australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of age group from teenagers to dotage male and female who were engaged in regular physical activity in 2010.
Most noticeably of all, it can be seen that the percentage of male adolescents was higher as compared to female teenagers for doing daily physical activities ( about 52.8% and 47.7% respectively) but consequently male teenagers were actively highly engaged in physical task as compared to other men age. The percentage of age group 25 to 34 male and female was quite lower as compared to teenagers but surprisingly, the female percentages was maximum by 48.9 as compared to male; 42.2 percentage
Likewise from the age group 35 to 44 the percentage of female was higher with 52.5% while the male percentage was only 39.5%. whilst looking at proportion of female from age group 45 to 64 it was relatively constant with 53% although 0.3% was higher with 45 to 54 female age group while the male percentage doing physical activities was hiking when ages goes higher from 45 to over either 43.1% to 46.7% respectively. Moreover, the dotage female percentage was nearly equal with teenagers with 47.1%.
To sum up, female ratio was higher for doing physical task in comparison with male ratio.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 11
- The chart belows shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in uk,divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections unitl 2030. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections unitl 2030. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rcentage of male adolescents was higher as compared to female teenagers for doing ...
^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gers for doing daily physical activities about 52.8% and 47.7% respectively but ...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties about 52.8% and 47.7% respectively but consequently male teenagers were act...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...5 to 34 male and female was quite lower as compared to teenagers but surprisingly,...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
... compared to male; 42.2 percentage Likewise from the age group 35 to 44 the percent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...ile the male percentage was only 39.5%. whilst looking at proportion of female from ag...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, likewise, look, moreover, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01923076923 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68458714444 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485576923077 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.825695295 43.030603864 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.0 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224379640588 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147432772744 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123703740097 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182265386204 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136325625264 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.