The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following bar chart illustrates to what extent females and males of six distinct age groups taking part in physical activity regularly in Australia in 2010.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, the age groups can be divided in two classes. The first class consists of people who they are 65 and over. Nearly as many females as males participated in physical activity, 47.1% versus 46.7% precisely in 2010.
However, other five age groups are placed in the second class due to significant difference of men’s and women’s percentage. While younger than 25 men were more involved in physical exercise by 52.8, the women’s percentage was 47.7 in the same age group. Moreover, three age groups of 35 to 44, 45 to 54, and 55 to 64 showed approximately a similar pattern. Whereas around 53% of females of these three age groups did regular physical activity in 2010, the share of males was remarkably lower, 39.5%, 43.1%, and 45.1% respectively. The same pattern could be observed in individuals between 25 to 34 years old.
It is clear from the bar chart that unlike 15 to 24 age group, more Australian women over 25 than men tended to do physical activity regularly in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | kub | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Iqreet Kaur | 100 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | sattar_iust | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-20 | Vickie | 68 | view |
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 88
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81463414634 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61671740814 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4124271972 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332243934048 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12488808896 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085402304068 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213696772968 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682575404289 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81463414634 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61671740814 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4124271972 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332243934048 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12488808896 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085402304068 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213696772968 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682575404289 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.