The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The given bar chart provides the comparision of different age group of men and women in Australia who did physical activities in year 2010.
Overall, majority of women preferred to spend their time on physical activities as compared to the men for all the age groups, except 15 to 24 age group.
looking at the 15 year age group, the amount of male was all time higher at 52.8% which was 5% higher than female of that age catagory. In remaining age groups altered scenario was observed than this age group. 48.9% of womend excersized in 25 to 34 age bracket, that was as high as 6% than their counterpart.
In next theree groups significant difference was there between both the genders. 35-44 age group was at 39.5% male candidates and 52.5% females. 43.1% of men involved in physical work for 45-54 age group, followed by 53.3% women. In 55-64 age period, 53% women participated in physical activities, whereas in opposite sex 45.1% scale was available. Surprisingly, the senior citizens were almost equally interested toward physical activities which was 46.7% and 47.1% male and female respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...ge groups, except 15 to 24 age group. looking at the 15 year age group, the amount of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bracket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'brackets'.
Suggestion: brackets
...9% of womend excersized in 25 to 34 age bracket, that was as high as 6% than their coun...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 47.1% male and female respectively.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95161290323 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66981365644 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5672298436 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342256804607 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157529231709 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142873178568 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274296410854 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163579340154 0.0819641961636 200% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.