The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The graph illustrates the rate of growth in average property prices in three different nations, namely Algeria, China, and Argentina from 2007 to 2010. Overall, the percent in mean property prices in China increased, while the figure for both Algeria and Argentina went down in this period.
The rate of average property prices in Algeria was highest about over 6 percent in 2007, subsequently, it went down to exactly 4.5 percent, then this figure decreased to around 3 percent at the end of the period. In addition, the percentage of property prices in Algeria increased by 2 percent (from just over 3 percent to around 5 percent) in the first two years, it fell to just over 1 percent in 2009 and recovered to over 2 percent in 2010.
By contrast, the rate of growth in average property prices in China was lowest with approximately 2 percent, at the beginning of the period, subsequently, it rose to double times in next year. In two years of the end of the period, the rate of growth in average property prices went up, ending with over 6 percent to become highest compare with the two countries.
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- Some people think that the government should offer financial support and care to old people while others think that people should save money for their future life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 67
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the highest'.
Suggestion: become the highest
... went up, ending with over 6 percent to become highest compare with the two countries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58818328968 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432989690722 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.2748612184 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209291944815 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138058122206 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091376064535 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166824880376 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609912563127 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.