the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater-goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre.
The bar chart gives information on reasons of irritants for theatre-goers during performances in percent in twelve categories. The results are obtained by a poll of theatre-goers. Overall, resulting from sweet papers, coughing and arriving late with about 90, 79 and 70 percent respectively were the most reason of disturbs during the performance at the theatre.
As can be seen, whispering, mobile phones, sneezing and bleeps with 60, 50 and 40 percent respectively after that reasons which mentioned about were more make irritate others at the theatre. The obvious point is that the most irritants were reasons that made noise such as sneezing, coughing and other things that are shown in this chart.
Similarly, tall people and snoring had the same quantity of 30 %. Also, flash photography and big hairdos with the same percentage about 29% made another part of this chart. The least proportion was related to armrest hogging with 20% mainly because it has not made a distraction as much as other reasons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-10 | beauty flowers | 55 | view |
2018-09-20 | mahsa1989 | 67 | view |
- the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre 67
- The figures below show the changing trends in leisure in Europe for certain industries 82
- Currently, there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- In some countries, it is illegal for an employer to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 67
- Technology has taken control of some peoples’ lives. We should try to take control of technology. Give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17575757576 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76938135204 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678787878788 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.432747065 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194933080316 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829889761355 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798499651939 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130015411203 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128684894087 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.