The given bar chart gives information about the survey which the personnel division at a prime company conducts. Moreover, this chart is presented in terms of various factors affecting the work performance and two age categories.
Overall, the substantial gap could be observed in the variables of chance for personal development, relaxed working environment, and promotion prospects. Other remained factors see equivalent numbers or nearly commensurate.
Turing to the detail, in terms of the pinnacle, people who age 18-30 believe the most affecting factor is the chance for personal development, standing at 90%. However, work environment is the least affected factor among the whole in terms of 18-30-year-old people. By the same token, the predominant number of age group 45-60 could be seen in the factor “money”, arriving at 70%. In contrast, there is the least statistics in the factor of job security among people who age 45-60, with merely one-fifth.
The most striking point is that the chart witnesses the similar number in the factor “team spirit” and “work environment”, standing at 60% and 30%, respectively. It is worth noting that the yawning gap falls into the variable of relaxed working environment, with 80% in age group 18-30 and roughly 30% in 45-60 aged people.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In spite of advances made in agriculture,many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this case ?What can be done about this problems? 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- Some people think the government should spend money on technology while the others think it should be for free education. Discuss both views and give your idea. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44174757282 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13624168021 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4358076085 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291113341453 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117918722719 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568073545692 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172057632823 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815764179954 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.