The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period.Summari

The table gives information about the changes of the visitors numbers during the year before and after rebuilding of Ashdown Museum, whereas the pie charts compare the statistics of satisfaction of visitors in same given period.

On the whole, there was a tremendous change in terms of the number of the visitors as can be seen in the table. In addition, the majority of visitors were satisfied by the renovation.

Turning to the detail, the Ashdown Musem saw a significant grown in the visitors, rising from 74 thousand to 92 thousand. As for the pie chart, 40% of visitors were dissatisfied before refurbishment, as opposed to the visitors who did not response, accounting for 5%. However, the "lion shares" could be observed in visitors who were satisfied after the renewing of the musuem, standing at 40%.

The most striking point is the figure of visitors who were very satisfied underwent an enormous increase after renovation, growing by 20%. By the same token, the proportion of dissatisfied had plummeted from 40% to 15% after renewing the museum. Furthermore, the number of people who were" no response" remained unchanged regardless of the given period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...es information about the changes of the visitors numbers during the year before and afte...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, whereas, as for, in addition, on the whole, by the same token

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99592822636 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2713021614 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315614649421 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126880347703 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931426545424 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20755857892 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926256826026 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.