The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph given represents the top ten most productive and consumptive countries in electricity during 2014.

Overall, it is obvious that two tops countries dominated the main feature. As an illustration, electricity generation and utilization in these two nations were greater than the combination of the other eight.

To begin with, China ranked the first place in electricity production and consumption with just above 5 trillion kWh, followed by the States with approximately 4 trillion kWh, leaving Russia at roughly 1 trillion kWh. Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany accounted for nearly 900 billion to 500 billion respectively. Meanwhile the electric’s generation in other countries outweighed the electric’s utilization, that in Germany showed the opposite.

Turning to Korea Republic, this nation produced 1000 times fewer than China in electricity in the year of 2014 as much as consumed with just under 450 billion kWh. Therefore, it was unsurprisingly stand the final place on ranking. The figure is predicted to increase correspondingly to the population growth.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-22 cheese.cheese 84 view
2019-05-07 nicktyranov 84 view
2019-02-28 minhtrieutr 56 view
Essays by user cheese.cheese :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...00 billion to 500 billion respectively. Meanwhile the electric's generation in other...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
...n kWh. Therefore, it was unsurprisingly stand the final place on ranking. The figure ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, therefore, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70303030303 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25525075592 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678787878788 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5892838294 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186762385466 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947162552175 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879114831681 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130561095897 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910132309587 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.