The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The given visual demonstrates ten countries which produced and implemented the most electrical power worldwide in the year of 2014. China ranks first in production and consumption, as illustrated, and the United States obtained the second place. Russian, Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany, and Korea Republic are the next ones by far from these two countries.
First, China has produced 5398 billion kWh electricity in 2014, and has consumed 5322 billion kWh. The second rank country, the US, showed a record of 4099 billion kWh for the production, and 3866 billion kWh for the use in 2014. China and the United States were substantially distant from other countries since the US produces 4 times and consumes 3 times the third country, which is Russia.
Next, for all the listed countries, production exceeds the consumption, except for Germany which produced 526.6 billion kWh electricity in 2014, but consumed 582.5 billion kWh electricity, thereby ranking 6 in consumption and 9 in production.
Finally, Korea Republic with 485.1 billion kWh production and 449.1 billion kWh consumption ranked 10 in this list.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | msolanki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- Describing the ways in which elephants fascinate humans - TPO51 76
- What celebrities state are of greater importance for young people rather than for older people. 76
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- A tv station's business manager proposes to increase time of local news and weather news in late night news for some reasons. 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or co-workers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, third, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37988826816 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77461912385 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4093447767 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19753088902 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927005120537 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686219562516 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127729985795 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398788207719 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.