The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given bar graph illustrates the amount of electricity produced and the spending on electric energy in ten nations used electricity the most in the world in the year 2014.
In general, it is clear that the expenditure on electricity of China and the US was the most in the world and the electricity produced was not too much different from the expenditure.
The production on electricity of China was the first rank with 5368 billion kWh while the spending was also the most at 5322 kWh. Following by that is the US, the electricity produced was 4099 kWh which was lower than China about 1300 kWh, the expense on electricity was also be surpassed by China, at 3866 kWh.
However, although The US was the second position in the rank, it still outnumbered almost four times with Russia which was third rank, 4099 kWh versus 1057 kWh in terms of production, regarding to consumption that was 3866 kWh in the comparison with 1038 kWh. While the rest of the rank is quite the same about the amount of electricity produced and the spending on electricity, average 650kWh and 600 kWh, respectively.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree of disagree with this opinion 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69765523186 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 64.0 22.4926829268 285% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 261.890986651 43.030603864 609% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 302.0 112.824112599 268% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 64.0 22.9334400587 279% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.6666666667 5.23603664747 509% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865577921218 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855229353863 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524366536345 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730421289372 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502294919005 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.8 13.2329268293 248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.44 61.2550243902 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.9 10.3012195122 251% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 27.6 10.9970731707 251% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.