The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart depicts the data for electricity produced a consumed in 2014. As observed from the given illustration, China was top leading for generating and utilizing electricity and among the given countries Korea Rep. had the least ratio.
China and the United States appear to have made a remarkable improvement in almost both sectors. As made outstanding progress China was highest appeared to be completely shoulder to shoulder by 5,398 billion kWh and 5,322 billion respectively. As observed United States produced 4,099 billion kWh and utilized 3,866 billion kWh.Taking into consideration Russia and Japan leading on third and fourth with almost a thousand billion kWh in both sectors.
A bit ahead India and Canada were relatively lower, just 871 billion generated and 698.8 billion used compared to 618.9 billion produced and 499.9 billion consumed respectively.
In almost all other cases data of electricity generation and utilization in Korea was weakest and figures for France, Brazil, and German were slightly higher. It was remarkable that German was the only country that produced 582.5 billion kWh in comparison with 526.6 billion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-28 | tiendung00001 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 33
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Taking
...lion kWh and utilized 3,866 billion kWh.Taking into consideration Russia and Japan lea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46111111111 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74677701145 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.316895615 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786318133405 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505661138559 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623288040672 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655400662054 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812369233178 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.