The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
As observed from the given illustration that the electricity generation from fuel sources in Australia and in France throughout the period of 1980 and 2000. It is worth noticing from pie charts that most significant growth, coal was the main source for electricity production in Australia while France consumed Nuclear Power more in previous years to generate their electricity demand.
To be more specific, Australia continually produced 100 units of electricity in 1980 and 170 units in 2000 while the generation in France was 90 units and doubled in the year 2000. Taking into consideration, coal was the main source of electricity production in Australia and half of the total electricity produced came from coal in 1980. Natural gas and hydropower come up with producing 20 units of electricity while the remaining 10 units were produced from oil. The province on coal expanded in 2000 for electricity production while oil and natural gases were very slightly used for electricity production. Nuclear power was not used in Australia as a source for generating electricity.
On the contrary, In France, natural gas and coal together produced half of the electricity in 1980. The use of nuclear power increased significantly in France in 2000 amounting 126 units in this year compared to the 15 units 20 years back.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 59
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compared to the 15 units 20 years back.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17209302326 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92034507544 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46976744186 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1609307745 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412938980549 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186267984777 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850307992513 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293333074639 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855268647489 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.