The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The chart illustrates of the percentage of electricity units by fuel source between australia and france in 1980 and 2000. Overall, the most electricity production in australia during these periods utilized coal fuel. In contrast, the france had changed their electricity production from natural gas and coal based in 1980 to nuclear power in 2000.
Furthermore, during 1980 to 2000, the number of electricity units by coal based in australia uplifted extremely, had added more than 70 units. The enhancement also occurred in electricity units by hydro power based of australia that in 1980 just reached 20 units, in 2000 attained more than 30 units.
In contrast, the uppermost of electricity units production of france in 1980 were produced by natural gas and coal fuel, which them reached 25 units respectively. In 2000, even though the number of electricity units by natural gas and coal based lean to stagnant, albeit france had increased the number of electricity units production by nuclear power remarkably, which in 1980 just produced 15 units, in 2000 produced more than 120 units.
- Some people say that sports play an important role in society. Others, however, think that it is nothing more than a leisure activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree? 56
- Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20338983051 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77760476974 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429378531073 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8482372326 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436816061396 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265649369337 0.103423049105 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126148544545 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339485592286 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117759924881 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.