The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

The two pie charts indicate the units from electricity production which produce by five different kinds of source from 1980 to 2000 in Australia and France.

The first pie chart shows that the major source of electric came from coal which occupied half of total in 1980. And in 2000, the production of same figure reached in 130 units. Two decades witnessed a 70 units increase which from 100 units to 170 units in Australia. With time goes by, less oil and natural gas are used in electricity production which decreased from 10 to 2 in oil and 20 to 2 in gas. The rest of source was replaced by coal and hydro power.

In France, the situation was totally different. In 1980, natural gas and coal occupied 25 unit each in electricity production. And nuclear power only had 15 units. But after twenty years, the nuclear power became the main source for producing electric power which occupied 126 units. The hydro power and natural gas became the least which only occupied 2 units each.

Overall, France like to use nuclear power as the source for producing electric, while Australia prefer coal with time goes by.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-18 junjunh 67 view
2019-10-18 hunanmail 73 view
2019-08-14 fachryadul92 67 view
2019-06-21 Pritika96 61 view
2019-05-07 Karmesh 67 view
Essays by user hunanmail :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34242578515 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1581211102 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326318562737 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119361521702 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108093288467 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224985509296 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122270778147 0.0819641961636 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.