The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categorises, from 2001 -2008
The bar chart gives information about the time spending for telephone call was made by australian among the three given categories for seven years consecutive years from 2001 to 2008.
In general, although the local call showed a dropping trend from 2005, it was still the most common in Australia while two categorizes had a gradual growth over the years.
The figure for a local call was the highest throughout the period, experienced steady growth between 2001 and 2004, from 72 to nearly 90 billion minutes. After reaching a peak of 90 in 2005, it had fallen back to 72 billion in 2009.
In terms of the national and international calls and mobile calls, they showed a similar pattern of growth between 2001 and 2009. The australian were prone to use mobiles instead of the local, the figure for mobiles had a dramatic rise from 2006, standing at 46 billion in 2009 while the figure for the national and international continued its rising trend from 38 billion in 2001 to 61 billion in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 73 | view |
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region. 73
- the graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles 78
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 78
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005. 78
- Topic: as well as making money, business also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49372975075 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2051518029 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240367835098 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116652863538 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521842392701 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143440527695 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430287133598 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.