The bar chart compares the numerical data in minutes for phone conversations made in the United Kingdom, done in three ways between 1995 to 2002.
Overal, local calls were made regularly throughout the period, while use of mobile phones was relatively low. Further, trend in use of cellphones continue to rise gradually over the given period, as well as national and international calls using landline.
It can be clearly seen on the chart, that local calls were popularly made throughout the period and it peaked at 90 billion minutes in 1999 and the lowest point was in 1995 when it recorded 72 billion minutes.
Furthermore, local and overseas calls were done averagely throughout the years. The conversations made increased gradually from the beginning of the period, at 37 billion minutes in 1995 and 60billion in 2002. In 1995 cellphone use was unpopular as few calls were made, at approximately 3 billion minutes. Over the period, the number of calls made continue to rise dramatically. Use of mobile phone began to increase drastically, while calls made through landline fell steadily.
- In some countries people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the ampunt people can earn. 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
- The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16201117318 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77799159281 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0327026811 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157032427515 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770485545729 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508190223211 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110913258042 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479647638058 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.