The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.

The bar graph display the cosr of fast foods incurred on weekly basis in Britain, while, the line graph illustrate consumption rate for fish and chips, pizzas as well as hamburgers from 1970 to 1990.

Overall, people of high and average income status have a high expenditure rate for harmburgers whilst the low income people disburse less on harmburgers.The cost of fish and chips was equal in the elite and below income people. Less money was spent on pizzas in both three groups.

Consumption of fish and chips was on the rise beginning of 1970, at 300grammes. It remained constant until towards 1975 when it dropped to 200grammes after 1980. From 1980 to 1985 it remained stagnant and rose again to 220grammes in 1990. Harmburgers were not consumed much at the beginning of 1970, at 90grammes. The graph for harmburgers began to rise gradually from 1975 until it reached 500grammes in 1990. The pizza consumption rate was slower from 1970 and it rose gradually, until 1975 when there was a significant rise. In 1990 consumed pizza reached 270grammes.

It is of note that the elite group disburse much of the money on harmburgers above 40pence, whilst the middle class and low income spent 14 pence and 7 pence on harmburgers respectively. The high income and low income has equal expenditure on fish and chips at 17pence, while average income class spent 25pence weekly per person. Nineteen pence was folked out by high income people to purchase pizza, as medium and low income class disburse less on pizzas at 12pence and 7pence respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ome people disburse less on harmburgers.The cost of fish and chips was equal in th...
^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...disburse less on harmburgers.The cost of fish and chips was equal in the elite an...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fish and chips at 17pence, while average income class spent 25pence weekly per pe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93893129771 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62766232391 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473282442748 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4917539752 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109081705552 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407635159848 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558238186471 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852485566262 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723461425733 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.