The bar chart shows the number of students who studied distinct subjects at university stage between 96-97 and 00-01.
Overall, the number of students preferring medicine and dentistry, biology sciences increased over the period as opposed to the reduction of those in engineering and technology, physical sciences. The most popular branch was engineering whereas the least popular one was medicine and Dentistry.
In 1996, computer sciences was chosen by nearly 7500 students that is equal to the value of physical sciences. During the period, the number of students enrolling computer sciences department raised sharply by the percentage of 40 and in 2001 12000 students constitute department. Thus, computer sciences reached Engineering because that dropped steadily when computer sciences showed a great increase. In this period biology sciences increased by 15000 students to 95000 students.
In the first three years, physical remained stable but there was a slight drop in 1999 and it stayed constant at 70000. However, Medicine and Dentistry had a slight rise and climbed to 45000 from 40000 university students.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- the bar chart illustrates the number of students studying different subject at university level over a five year period 78
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54651162791 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67742500384 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6595434277 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221992279307 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916710213772 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100100361882 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145812659115 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112124015971 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.