The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years.
Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending more money on housing and leisure, fuel energy was the lowest.
In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on food and it had the most spending compared to other items, each of which accounted for only 5 to 10%. Housing and leisure had the same spending range accouting for 10%. Among these, fuel and power was the lowest at 6%.
However, compared to 2018 food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spending areas in 2018, making up from 10% and 9% in 1968 to 19% and 22% in 2018. Furthermore, families only spend 8% for transport in 1968 and increased 14% in 2018. In addition, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and only stays between 4 and 5%
The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years.
Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending more money on housing and leisure, fuel energy was the lowest.
In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on food and it had the most spending compared to other items, each of which accounted for only 5 to 10%. Housing and leisure had the same spending range accouting for 10%. Among these, fuel and power was the lowest at 6%.
However, compared to 2018 food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spending areas in 2018, making up from 10% and 9% in 1968 to 19% and 22% in 2018. Furthermore, families only spend 8% for transport in 1968 and increased 14% in 2018. In addition, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and only stays between 4 and 5%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | tran quynh | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 56
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisons where relevant 56
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erage weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years. ...
^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in one particular country in two years. Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending m...
^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the lowest. In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on fo...
^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , accouting
... food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , housing
...verage family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spend...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , personal
...n, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85632183908 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89012957834 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2993472529 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564959294116 0.215688989381 262% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219412663902 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146129452699 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39044625446 0.15604864568 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140349649133 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.