The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years Overall food had a higher rate in 1968 Meanwhile in 2018 families spending more money on housing and leisure fuel energy was the lowest In

Essay topics:

The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years.
Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending more money on housing and leisure, fuel energy was the lowest.
In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on food and it had the most spending compared to other items, each of which accounted for only 5 to 10%. Housing and leisure had the same spending range accouting for 10%. Among these, fuel and power was the lowest at 6%.
However, compared to 2018 food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spending areas in 2018, making up from 10% and 9% in 1968 to 19% and 22% in 2018. Furthermore, families only spend 8% for transport in 1968 and increased 14% in 2018. In addition, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and only stays between 4 and 5%

The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years.
Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending more money on housing and leisure, fuel energy was the lowest.
In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on food and it had the most spending compared to other items, each of which accounted for only 5 to 10%. Housing and leisure had the same spending range accouting for 10%. Among these, fuel and power was the lowest at 6%.
However, compared to 2018 food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spending areas in 2018, making up from 10% and 9% in 1968 to 19% and 22% in 2018. Furthermore, families only spend 8% for transport in 1968 and increased 14% in 2018. In addition, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and only stays between 4 and 5%

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-20 tran quynh 84 view
Essays by user tran quynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erage weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years. ...
^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in one particular country in two years. Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Overall, food had a higher rate in 1968 . Meanwhile, in 2018, families spending m...
^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the lowest. In 1968,families spent on avarage 35% of their weekly income on fo...
^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , accouting
... food had a market change in expenditure,accouting only 17% weekly average family earning....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , housing
...verage family earning. On the other hand,housing and leisurre occupied the highest spend...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , personal
...n, fuel and power, clothing and footware,personal goods shows no sign of increasing and o...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85632183908 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89012957834 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2993472529 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564959294116 0.215688989381 262% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219412663902 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146129452699 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39044625446 0.15604864568 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140349649133 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.