The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant.

The bar chart give information about an illustration of price production in four countries over a period of ten years.
Overall, it is clear that the price production in 2015 is highest among three years. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the bar chart in 2015 and 2005. It can be seen that the price production in 2015 of first country is highest among four countries is 50 million tons. However, in this year of country C and D is remarkably blow and have same number is 3 million tons and in 2005 country C has a slightly higher metric than D when C is 3 million tons but D have only 2 million tons. With country A and B have highest figure, country A still the country with the highest figures is 48 million tons but country B is up to three times lower is 27 million tons. Meanwhile, in 2015 this country have significantly increasing and have 35 million tons.
Look at the bar chart in 2010, the price production in country C and B is lowest and only have two million tons of D and have 5 million tons of C. By contrast, with two countries remaining is A and B is still highest when the first country have highest number is 47 military tons and the second country have 42 million tons.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-27 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blowed', 'blown'.
Suggestion: blowed; blown
...s year of country C and D is remarkably blow and have same number is 3 million tons ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...ly 2 million tons. With country A and B have highest figure, country A still the country wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...is still highest when the first country have highest number is 47 military tons and the seco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26180257511 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46173912441 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403433476395 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5387709982 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228282351206 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134925294469 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885497488219 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172368971064 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732072344178 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.