The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the attitudes toward future tendencies of young Europeans in the next two decades in five aspects.
Generally, with the exception of communication, most areas show the superiority of negative expectations among youngsters, especially in terms of air quality. Besides, a similarity is recorded in the proportions of health and water quality, whereas there is a relative balance between the numbers of young Europeans who believe in the improvement of food quality and those who believe in its deterioration.
In the next 20 years, over 40% of European youngsters think that general well-being will become better, which is around two-thirds of their opponent counterparts. Similarly, two in five young Europeans hold a belief in an optimistic change in water quality. However, a relative equilibrium was seen in the expectation for food quality in the two following decades.
Considering the remaining categories, regarding air quality, a majority of youngsters in Europe have a negative view toward its future state with a figure of over 75%. However, the situation changes completely when it comes to human interaction because there is a dominance of positive expectations, specifically at over 60%, of European young people.
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people feel that government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinemas Others feel that violent films should not be regulated Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...o decades in five aspects. Generally, with the exception of communication, most areas show the supe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, regarding, similarly, third, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49222797927 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18332962146 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8201306742 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176106331016 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078439727225 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479310529633 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109736858813 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046311437876 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.