The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict water usage for three purposes (industrial, agricultural, and domestic use) in six particular areas (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia), represented by percentages.
Overall, most of these continents focus on agricultural use, except for North America and Europe as these areas mainly use water for industrial use. However, the percentage of water used for domestic use is insignificant.
In detail, 88% of water is used for agricultural sectors in Central Asia, which is also the highest percentage, followed by Africa (84%) and South East Asia (81%). On the contrary, domestic and industrial use are given less priority by these areas as the combined percentage of these sectors only ranged from 12% to 19%.
In North America and Europe, around half of the water goes to industrial purposes (48% and 53% respectively), whereas only 13% and 15% of water are used for domestic purposes. Also, South America accounts for one of the highest percentages of water used for agriculture (71%) and domestic (19%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the design of a modern land ll for household waste 78
- writng task 1 ielts academic table 56
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, except for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78917109409 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7897583045 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240721473071 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142648143658 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509488185922 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169201304413 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506895719044 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.