Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Poverty and the wealth distance between countries have long been worrying problems. Normally, developed nations offer financial assistance to underdeveloped ones as a way to tackle poverty. However, since this measure seems to be ineffective, many people think that richer nations should apply other solutions. Personally, I agree with this statement.
According to several researchers, the major reasons for poverty are usually the incompetence and corruption of governments. Therefore, giving money to poor countries is an unreasonable solution since the local authorities can not manage that resource properly. Moreover, without adequate guidance and observation, financial assistance might be exploited for other purposes. For instance, many European countries gave millions of dollars to Greece to help its government overcome the economic crisis. Unfortunately, given that the corruption of Greece's authority was severe, most of the money went straight into the pocket of powerful Greek politicians.
For these reasons, other measures should be considered to solve poverty. Firstly, offering developing countries qualified education is a plausible way to enhance their future employment, which could solve poverty sustainably since employed people can earn their own living. Secondly, foreign investments can also facilitate the development of developing nations. By way of explanation, the construction of several factories funded by global organizations could create thousands of works for the locals. Finally, professionals could be sent to underdeveloped areas to help the indigenous authorities in terms of medication, education, and government operation, to name but a few. With the help of professionals, incompetent authorities can improve their performance.
In conclusion, since poverty is not simply the result of a lack of money, developed countries should give other kinds of assistance to poorer ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Bosses are paid higher than employees Some people say that this is necessary others claim that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- ielts writing task 1 26 02 2022 56
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 84
- The bar chart shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 89
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97111913357 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19665662248 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0135693541 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264443476817 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079503834772 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793251219095 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184817538693 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769877729532 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.05 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.