The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men & women per week in Australia in 2007.
Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented column graph compares Australian male and female in terms of their weekly working duration in 2007.
Overall, citizens’ working duration varied from 0 to above 80 hours. In addition, residents spending 30-50 hours per week were the most prevalent in both genders.
Turning into detail, with nearly 43%, man working between 30 and 50 hours per week occupied the highest percentage among 5 groups, followed by a figure of exactly 30% for 60-80 category. By contrast, in comparison to the aforementioned sectors, that of 10-20 and over 80 group were remarkably lower, with about 12% and 10%, respectively. Meanwhile, male working less than 10 hours per week accounted for only 5% of total population.
Regarding to female counterparts, people spending 30-50 hours per week at work occupied 35%, ranking first among all duration groups, whereas that of 10-20 sector was considerably smaller, with approximately 23%. In addition, there was an insignificant difference between 60-80 and 0-10 category, in which the former’s percentage of about 18% slightly edged out the latter’s, with 15%. Unlike other sectors, the rate of only a tenth revealed that fewest Australian women chose to work more than 80 hours per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | mylinh3001 | 78 | view |
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- People buy a product if it fulfills their needs there is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se to work more than 80 hours per week.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31472081218 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80346465172 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639593908629 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5216676125 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165259098249 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787481148467 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456869019311 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109882999023 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100641027097 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.