This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001
The figure above reveals the results of a survey carried out to determine graduate's status in full-time employment specific for each gender during these six years period from 1995 to 2001.
At the first glance, it can be seen that in the majority of these years men rather than women lucky to get their adequate occupations a part from 2001 which experienced an equal amount for males and females. The highest percentage of this figure devote to the year 2000 for both genders. Approximately, more over 84 percentage of male and just very small under 82 percentage.
Nonetheless, this statistic had experienced the least stage at the first year of this research. By the time past, it can be anticipated that for the future phase both males and females reach to a similar point. Maybe for now in which the survey did not gather the data have insignificant erratic behavior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-13 | saeed2751366 | 91 | view |
| 2018-12-02 | reza_rasht | 24 | view |
- This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports felicities. Others, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give your opinio 78
- This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001. 61
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- Do good exam results at school or college guarantee success in life? Discuss. Do you believe that studying hard will bring a better life 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nonetheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62220433139 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.133318258 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138246371622 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604033817434 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529101098523 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100576557515 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051109722598 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.