The bar chart shows the percentage of fims produced by 5 different countries in 3 years.
The bar chart gives information about the films generated proportion by 5 nations over the period of 3 years from 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, all proportions followed an upward trend throughout the time frame, with the exception of A and C.
As the chart portrays, there was a correlation between the film produced percentage in D and E. To be precise, they both followed an initial rise over the examined years, but the former holding 10% more than the latter. Meanwhile, the figure for B showed a jump of 2% and 13% in 2008 and 2009 respectively from the original level of approximately 31%.
On the other hand, A produced eight to ten of the 2007 total films generated, though there was a decline in those next year, it still kept more than 70% and responsible for the primary sources of films creation. In addition, 20% of films in 2007 were made by C, which percentage hovered around the initial point and finally kept the third rank owing to reaching 19%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
2019-02-28 | NhatPhong | 73 | view |
2018-11-20 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
2017-07-25 | alicedoan1112 | 87 | view |
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
- the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...upward trend throughout the time frame, with the exception of A and C. As the chart portrays, there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, so, still, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67052023121 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64472187144 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9693739617 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158432719582 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756965717132 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756408709477 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894528239207 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591506797458 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.