The bar chart shows the percentage of fims produced by 5 different countries in 3 years.
The bar chart gives information about the films generated proportion by 5 nations over the period of 3 years from 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, all proportions followed an upward trend throughout the time frame, with the exception of A and C.
As the chart portrays, there was a correlation between the film produced percentage in D and E. To be precise, they both followed an initial rise over the examined years, but the former holding 10% more than the latter. Meanwhile, the figure for B showed a jump of 2% and 13% in 2008 and 2009 respectively from the original level of approximately 31%.
On the other hand, A produced eight to ten of the 2007 total films generated, though there was a decline in those next year, it still kept more than 70% and responsible for the primary sources of films creation. In addition, 20% of films in 2007 were made by C, which percentage hovered around the initial point and finally kept the third rank owing to reaching 19%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | NhatPhong | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | alicedoan1112 | 87 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 84
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 89
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 49
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...upward trend throughout the time frame, with the exception of A and C. As the chart portrays, there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, so, still, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67052023121 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64472187144 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9693739617 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158432719582 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756965717132 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756408709477 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894528239207 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591506797458 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.