the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000
The graph gives information about the survey based on the age of internet users across Taiwan from 1998 to 2000.
Looking from an overall perspective, the top two proportions in the given period were associated with 16-30 years and 31-50 years.
In 1998, more than half of the internet subscribers in Taiwan were from 16-30 years old, and another 40% were from 31-50 years old. In the following years, the group from 16-30 years still was the majority group, though there was a moderate drop to 45%, those kept declined trivially in 2000. The figure of 31-50 years was responsible for the second-highest proportion, during showed a negligible fall in the last two years.
The dipping of those percentages dragged the improvement of those under 15 and above 50 years. To be precise, 2-3% of Taiwan resident who used the internet in 1998 were junior, which percentage followed a growth in both 1990 and 2000 by 1% and 2%, in turn. On the other hand, the elderly attributed nearly 10% in 2000 before reaching 5% at the start.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of fims produced by 5 different countries in 3 years 78
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, second, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76404494382 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50287046419 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3772434865 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254777282802 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109729308906 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115741975887 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166705659256 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132969722585 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.