The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1971 and 2001.
The bar chart elucidates the proportion of house works with cars in a European country over a period of 30 years from 1971 to 2001.
Overall, households without cars were highly preferred at the beginning of a year, however, the highest percentage of residents utilized their transport for these works at the end of the period.
To begin with, home duties without any transportation experienced a peak, that was almost 50 percent, whilst 35 percent of duties have done by a car and just 25 percent of them performed by more than two vehicles in 1971. However, the rate of the house works lacking a car is constantly declined from 40 percent in 1981 to 30 percent in 2001. Subsequently, the percentage of works with any transit is accelerated to 40 percent in 1981 and approximately 50 percent in 2001, with the notable exception of 38 percent in 1991.
Moreover, home occupations with more than two cars were more considered and its rate increased from 31 percent in 1981 to merely 40 percent in 2001, but it made up only 28 percent in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 67
- Water Usage Australia 71
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph below shows oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 56
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73369565217 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74063429214 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5312851192 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240461571226 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141652371712 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114604920299 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174767776125 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128389142968 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.