It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Securing the environment is one of the most outstanding duties of humanity. It is suggested that primary children should learn how to cultivate vegetables and secure animals. This essay will look into the merits, which outweigh the demerits of this activity in the following paragraphs with some smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one side, growing flowers and vegetables are the most preventative procedures to take caring of the environment. Mainly because if parents or teachers teach children to perform these works, they will tackle some controversial issues like climate change, deforestation and others. For instance, planting vegetables can lead to sufficient consumption of meals, which does not cause poverty, and it is indisputable fact that every person generates carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, then, plants recycle this exhausted gases to the oxygen, which is one of the most necessary fumes in the earth. As a result, it would prevent the climate change issue. Therefore, these types of activities should teach kids from their childhood, and individuals can preserve the world.
On the other side, keeping animals is an equally indispensable duty in this world. That is because the residents cannot imagine their life without wildlife, and it performs a tremendous role for them. For example, it is irrefutable that animals provide humans with some edible productions like milk, meat, egg, and others. If children or elderly people secure the animals, they can obtain a huge number of benefits. Furthermore, keeping animals can prevent food shortage problems, facing some destitute countries.
In conclusion, it is evident that teaching how to cultivate plants, vegetables, and securing wildlife are the essential lessons, which should be given to every child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be an effective 61
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 91
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45519713262 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82241622096 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5512516934 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199379276231 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687915065765 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103965262537 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114125060687 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056884464412 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.