The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007.
The pie chart elucidates how the distribution of accommodation, as well as renting percentage, has modified in the UK, over 16 years period from 1991 to 2007.
Overall, despite a pretty increase from the past, the percentage of homeowners was the highest rather than the others, whilst despite there was a decline in the proportion, the social housing was the least in both years.
To begin with, the number of homes considerably climbed from 22 million in 1991 to 27 million in 2007, with 5 million rises. The rate of homeowners was the biggest by experiencing more than 50 percent while social and private renting made up 30, 20 percent respectively in 1991. However, social housing was the least preferred by presumably 15 percent in this period.
Moreover, there was a slight jump in home owning to compare to the past with 20 percent and made up 70 percent after 16 years. Subsequently, social and private renting quite reduced to 20 and 10 percent in 2007. Unfortunately, social housing has also declined to 5 percent in that year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | giangngoc | view | |
| 2023-03-13 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chungoclan2004 | view | |
| 2021-08-19 | chungoclan2004 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- Successful companies use advertisements to make more sales What can make an advertisement effective Do you think advertisements are a bad thing or a good thing for society 78
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Water Usage Australia 71
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84831460674 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7893074555 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3595014854 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203888746763 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902021586664 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729293461291 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13392893765 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841568404665 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84831460674 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7893074555 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3595014854 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203888746763 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902021586664 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729293461291 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13392893765 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841568404665 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.