The chart gives information about the rate of three different sizes of companies that made use of social networks for business aims from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, it is clear that smaller and smaller and medium companies employed social media over time, while the proportion of big players in business using technology remained stable, despite a dramatic periodic drop. Besides, the large companies tended to use social networks for business purposes more than those of the others.
About 28% of the small business utilizing social networks in 2013 and then rising gradually to about 35% after three years. However, one year later, the figure declined slightly to 30% in 2015, before reaching a peak at nearly 50% in the final year. Meanwhile, medium-sized organizations witnessed a significant increase by one-third in their figure, from 30% in 2012 to over a half in 2016, after reaching a high score of less than 40% in 2013 and 2014, and a low of 30% in 2015.
The percentage of a large business that used social media stayed steady in the first three years, at about 78%, which was followed by a dramatic drop to 50% in 2015. The figure started to go up again, at nearly 80% in 2016.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity 73
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be effected on society 89
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 89
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78640776699 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48966191256 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7991477204 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3490924413 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143991213034 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102682117996 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215501814043 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807614928743 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.