The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the total world population contributed by four countries in 1950 and 2002 and give some predictions by 2050.
Overall, there were considerable upward trend for the amount of global population in India while this figures for other countries went down remarkably. Another interesting point is that Japan always remained the smallest proportion over the period given.
Looking at details, although China ranked the top with 23% of total of world population, this country experienced a dramatic fall to 20% in 2002 and is forecasted to remained this trend by 2050, at 15%. Similarly, the number of people in Japan and USA made up the lest proportion at 5% and 7% respectively, then dropped by around 3% each in 2002. Meanwhile the population of the USA will stay unchanged by 2050, this figure for Japan is projected to reduce continuously to a negligible number.
By contrast, in 1950 the percentage of total of world population contributed by India was three times higher compared to Japan’s figure, at 15% and increased slowly by nearly 2% in 2002. According to anticipation, by 2050, Japan will surpass other three countries, reach the peak at just under 20% of global population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view | |
| 2020-10-09 | Sprios_D | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant 78
- moving from rural areas to big cities 78
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millionsof tonnes, from three different sources, between1990 and 2005. 73
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...unt of global population in India while this figures for other countries went down r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...then dropped by around 3% each in 2002. Meanwhile the population of the USA will stay unc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08374384236 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91640593411 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.660316502 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300507877299 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127260526769 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118723799152 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19943277343 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10992558342 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.