The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050.
The column chart illustrates the proportions of the population in the four countries named India, China, America, and Japan from 1950, 2002, and predicts these percentages in 2050.
Overall, while the figure for Indian in 1950 was the lowest, that in the rest was consistently the highest. In addition, throughout this period, the percentages of the Japanese population was the smallest.
As can be seen from the column chart, the majority of people in the world belonged to Chinese in 1950, at just over 23%, which was followed by India, at nearly 15%. The third one was the proportion of Americans (approximately 7%), which was around twice times as high as that of the population in Japan in this year (just under 5%). Also, the percentage of Chinese people in 2003 was the largest, which accounted for about 20%. Next came Indians, which made up nearly 17%. There were only roughly 5% and 3% of the population in the USA and Japan respectively.
Regarding the future data, in 2050, the highest figure of people will go to India, at over 17% and the second-highest will be in China, which will be about 7% as low as India. Nevertheless, only under 3% of Japanese and 5% of Americans in 2050
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 92 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view |
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources 84
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71770334928 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67320706904 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3379973672 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204198992601 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827398952572 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648955494922 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133971343646 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695332080913 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.