The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the total demographic rate in India, China, the USA, Japan in three different years, 1950, 2002, and an estimate for the future in 2050.
Overall, it is clear that India and China were and will account for the highest and second-highest numbers compared to the data of the other two countries. In particular, the total population percentage of China, the USA, Japan experienced a downward trend over the course of 52 years and will continue to decrease in 2050 whereas India witnessed an opposite trend throughout the same period.
In 1950, China registered the highest world population level, at about 23%, followed by India, with 15%. The remaining two numbers of the United States and Japan do not have much difference, at 8% and 4% respectively. In 2002, the figures for China and Japan dropped to 20% and approximately 3% in turn and is predicted to keep on falling to 15% and just around 2% sequentially in 2050.
The proportion of world demographics in the USA declined about 4% in 2002 and will remain unchanged in the next 48 years. An opposite trend was seen in India, this number progressively rose to 14% in 2002 and is projected to grow by 18% by 2050.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- The table shows the export values of various products in 1997 and 2010 89
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74519230769 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76678828584 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2707632781 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141511305259 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633105370391 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477951276475 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956653818356 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404206034588 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.