The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the number of European movie goers who chose to go to the cinema on six different days of the week in 2003, 2005, and 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that people living in Europe always went to see a movie on Friday over the given period. While, most of the days, the percentages of people going to the movie theaters fluctuated, there were fewer people prefer to go to the cinema on Wednesday throughout the three-year timeline.
In 2003, Saturday was the day a majority of European people decided to go to see a film, at 45%, followed by the percentage of people who go to the cinema on Friday and Saturday, which both stood at 30%. The lowest figure can be seen in the first day of the week, which was registered at the rate of 10% of residents would go to the movie theater. In 2005, the level of movies remained the same on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday as Saturday still remaining to the favorite day to see a movie on a big screen, and the proportion of European residents who go on Sunday slightly rose to around 34% while the number of moviegoers on Friday remained unchanged.
In 2007, the percentage of those who chose Saturday, Sunday and Monday the day to go to the cinema had a small decrease, which stood at approximately 43%, 33% and 13% respectively. A similar pattern was witnessed in the proportion of people going to the movie theater on Wednesday whose figures experienced a downward trend over three years before hitting the lowest point in the last year, at about 8%. The number of movie goers going on Tuesday and Thursday had a small increase, which was then registered at roughly 18% and 19% in turn. The only day European people want to go to see a film that remained at the same rate throughout the shown period was Friday.
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 324.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50308641975 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50724259538 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447530864198 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7686954382 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.9 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294421131331 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141573975809 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877890848575 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212984704981 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141311721522 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.