The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050.
The diagram illustrates the percentage of the total world population in countries such as India, China, USA and Japan in 1950 till 2003, and it also provides predictions by 2050.
Overall, in the start of the period China had the highest amount of the total world population, whereas Japan had the least. India was just below of China and it is only country that has grown over the period. On the other hand USA started well but had a slight fall and remain constant till the end of the peiod.
In 1995 China had an impact to the world population size approximetely by 23% and was in top top till 2002. Whereas, India started with only 15% and by predictions will have the total amount in 2050 by 18% and be in top while China will only have 15%
United States of America in 1995 started above 5% and had a slight fall in 2002, and by projections will stay constant till 2050. However in contrast Japan started below 5% and had a slight plunge in 2002 and will have a steady decline untill 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 92 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 56
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 66
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: top
...on size approximetely by 23% and was in top top till 2002. Whereas, India started with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ojections will stay constant till 2050. However in contrast Japan started below 5% and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43243243243 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25772596116 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9348933247 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184762292672 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948263934021 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106353826092 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141748380983 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118786918636 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.