The bar charts show different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman
The diagrams above display the removal number of rubbish based on the way which is chosen by several countries. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evidence that the highest waste disposal gained Toronto, specifically the landfill waste while the lowest percentage reached by Amman especially the composting rubbish.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the waste in Toronto and Amman. Both of this countries got the upper number of removing waste which was the landfill method, consecutively around three quarters and close to 50%, followed by incineration was one in ten and almost 40%. Afterward, the amount which was approximately 1%-10% attained by others.
Turning to the data in Madrid and Kuala lumpur, it has the biggest percentage in incineration successively two-fifths and 55%. Next, landfill methods in Madrid obtained near 30%, the same type from Kuala lumpur counted about 15% while recycling in the two countries had an identic number more than a fifth. Finally, the composting way attained 5%-10% which was the modest data from its places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | linhhocwriting | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | Wulan | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Tathya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | chungoclan2004 | 67 | view |
- In marriages today some argue that it is the responsibility of both spouses to earn a living for the family To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar charts show different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the waste in Toronto and Amman. Both of this countries got the upper number of remov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29378531073 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78012030563 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638418079096 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0061724801 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189256384406 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710835608383 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705450801445 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119887731293 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117735118914 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.