The bar charts show the various activities in the evening and how they often do between 1980 and 2010
The bar charts give the information on the different activities of people in the evening and the frequency of the activities per month.
Generally, the over 50 aged group spent their most time for visiting their family and friends while the online at home covered as the least activity that people enjoyed.
Taking a closer look on the bar chart 1980, the over 50 years group set aside their time for family and friends was about 10 times a month more than other groups and eating out were occupied at second place. The group of age from 15-25 years and 25-40 aged group showed the similar patterns that they both loved going to the cinema and go shopping and they went there for about more than 2 times and 3 times respectively.
Turning to 2010, it showed the different trend. The online at home became the most attractive activity and they did not often go for a visit .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-17 | nguyenthao2806 | 73 | view |
- Some say that young and energetic employees are the most valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. 56
- The graph below show the weekday volume of passengers activity on the Toronto Metro System for July 2007 67
- The diagrams below give information about internet use in different world regions of the world 47
- The chart below shows the percentage of school-leavers entering higher education (ie, colleges and universities), and graduate earnings 1 year after graduation 67
- The table below describes percentages of home schooled students in SomeCountry in 1999-2004. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ty and they did not often go for a visit .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56962025316 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17138763269 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6445489732 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1953840164 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114508442492 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665255844332 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138795785781 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818915893351 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.