The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport
modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000.
The chart shows how many passengers use transport in European towns, divided into four categories during forty-year period since 1960
Overall, it was noticeable that the figure for car experienced an upward trend during the period, whereas that other transports saw a reserved trend. Moreover, most travelers used the car in 2000.
Turning to detail, 1n 1960, foot, bike, and bus were used by most people in Europe, while the former accounted for 34% - the maximum recorded - the two latters were at 25% and 18% consecutively. By contrast, the smallest proportion of people used the car in Europe just under 10%.
Forty years later, the number of passengers used the car which increased significantly by more than a third from 6% to 36%. While the figures for bus, foot, and bike saw a downward trend, falling to 16%, 9%, 6% each. In 2000, car transport had the largest percentage of travelers in Europe (nearly 40%). Meanwhile, at approximately 6 % of passengers were using the bike.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 56
- Some people believe that a person s intelligence is inherited from the parents while others believe that their environment is the main factor Discuss these views Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence 74
- The graph below depicts information about British Emigration to selecteddestinations between 2004 and 2007. 84
- no 11
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children’s activities. Thefirst chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in,whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96363636364 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69993464899 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684848484848 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2070582896 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145946566104 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656878264588 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328231946978 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914037470809 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307909054722 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.