The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar chart reveals the amount of carbon emissions in thousand metric tonnes produced by six countries in 1975, 1990, and 2005. In general, a downward pattern of emissions observed in Germany and The UK while the other countries the opposite trend is reported. Additionally, it is conspicuous that The USA has the highest figures compared to the other nations in the given periods.

In 1975, approximately 1.200.000 tonnes of emissions produced in The USA compared to the other nations that only emitted between 100.000 to 300.000 tonnes. The USA's emissions quantity increased gradually and reach the maximum point in 2005 at 1.600.000. The lowest amount of carbon emitted reported in the first periods was in India. Although it rose gradually, the figures reached not more than 400.000 tonnes in 2005. The same trend of emissions also showed in Canada which experienced an increase although it was very slightly arround 50.000 tonnes in 30 years.

The supprising pattern of emissions was found in China. Though in the beginning periods the country produced only arround 300.000 tonnes, it rose dramatically by five fold in 2005. Finally, the remaining two nations, Germany and the UK showed a slightly decrease in their carbon emissions approximately 100.000 and 10.000 respectively during the periods.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...veals the amount of carbon emissions in thousand metric tonnes produced by six countries...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... two nations, Germany and the UK showed a slightly decrease in their carbon emissions approximately...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...10.000 respectively during the periods.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31428571429 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70985436096 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.864582049 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120304020729 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528834985387 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446649394624 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930397457561 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195843487968 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.