The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates carbon emission, measured in thousand metric tonnes in six different countries in 1975, 1990 and 2005.
Overall, the quantity of carbon emission produced by Germany and UK fell gradually, while there was a dramatic increase in other countries. In addition, the figure for USA was higher than in other nations.
In 1975, around 1200000 thousand metric tonnes were produced by USA and this rose rapidly, reaching a peaked of approximately 1600000 thousand metric tonnes in 2005. Although the amount of carbon emission in India was lowest in 1975, there was slight increase in 2005, which rose to over 300000 thousand metric tonnes.
By contrast, in 1975, the amount of carbon emission in China was over 300000 thousand metric tonnes, compared with under 200000 thousand metric tonnes in UK and Canada. Although between 1975 and 1990, the figures for Germany is the same, at under 300000 thousand metric tonnes, the amount of carbon emission measured peaked in 2005 in China at over 1500000 thousand tonnes and over 200000 thousand metric tonnes were produced in Germany, compared with under 200000 thousand metric tonnes in UK and Canada.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-03 | Preeti rupjee | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | Bala_s10 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | Madhu081191aluri | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. What extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 76
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...llustrates carbon emission, measured in thousand metric tonnes in six different countrie...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20105820106 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3552522421 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433862433862 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9632830561 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08055649376 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540408226476 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047757257638 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701627671696 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468784177474 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.