The bar graph below shows the scores of team A,B and c in a four different season.
The bar chart shows the score of teams A,B and C in four different seasons.
First of all, team A scored 5 points and team C 10 points in 2002. Besides this, in 2003 team A point increased twice which was 11% and scores of team B decreased and reached at 60 points and team C scores also uplifted and touched 15 points.
However, in the year 2004, team A made significant increase and reached at 30 points where as team B scores fell to 43 points and team C also loss their 3 points. However,in 2005,team A score went down to point B and team made 3 important and touched score of 55 points beside this team C fell at 5 points.
Overall, team B scores always remained high whether their score fell sometime. Team A made great improvements in 2004,but team c's points were always lower than A and B.
- in the modern world it is possible to stop, work and communicate with people via internet and live live without any face to face contact with others is it a positive or a negative development. 73
- People living in 21st century are enjoying better quality of life compared to people who lived in previous era do you agree or disagree? 73
- nowdays people use social media to keep up with the news. Why do they do this? Is it a positive or negative development trend? 73
- The bar graph below shows the scores of team A,B and c in a four different season. 61
- Some people say student should not given homework by their teachers on the other hand some say it play most important role in child development.Discuss the both view and with your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...The bar chart shows the score of teams A,B and C in four different seasons. Fir...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...icant increase and reached at 30 points where as team B scores fell to 43 points and tea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...team C also loss their 3 points. However,in 2005,team A score went down to point B ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 652.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28947368421 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35771520404 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 168.3 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4225584965 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1428571429 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307073876521 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210166447511 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141438083819 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274179047485 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159922087358 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 92.46 61.2550243902 151% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.