The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006

Essay topics:

The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

The bar graph provides information about various categories of digital games in term of their number of games sold worldwide over a 6 - year period starting from 2000.
It is noticeable that mobile phone games, online games, and handheld games witnessed an upward trend over the period shown, while the opposite was true for console games. Handheld games was the best selling games from 2000 to 2006.
There was only two digital games in 2000, which were console games and handheld games, stood at 6 billion and just over 11 billion respectively. 2 year later, mobile phone games and online games both appeared on the game market, accounting for about 1 billion, while handheld games increased by 2 billion and console games declined by half a billion. In 2003, mobile phone games experienced a substantial increase in the number of sales of around 3 billion, whereas the figure for online games was grew to 2 million. Similarly, handheld games was rised to 15 million, but console games was dipped slightly at 4 million.
In 2004, mobile phone games and online games both increased to about 4 million, while console games remained stable and handheld games climbed gradually. Over the following 2 years, mobile phones games, consoles games and handheld games were rised drastically, and console games fell to 3 million.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-16 dorae 56 view
2023-03-24 Ahihi12 84 view
2022-09-23 jadenguyen 78 view
2022-08-24 kavi jk 84 view
2022-08-21 celine ayoub 67 view
Essays by user ngoctram0724 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...whereas the figure for online games was grew to 2 million. Similarly, handheld games...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01363636364 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46028215212 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7914315487 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232597292154 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136787269446 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632105980163 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163655629078 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500220530791 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.