This chart illustrates the trends of migration from Great Britian between year 19999 and 2008.
Overall, immigrants were far more than emigrants and except a few variations, both increased in number over the years. The net migration was maximum in 2004.
Starting from 19999, nearly 300,000 people emigrated from UK while exactly 450,000 became immigrants. This trend rose steadily until year 2000 but levelled off in next year. Resultantly, in 2002 people moving out of UK had grown to approximately 350,000 but again stayed same until 2004. In contrast, incoming population showed a sharp rise reaching up to about 600,000 in 2004. The net migration, however, stayed largely uniform from about 160,000 in 1999 until 2004 when it peaked to approximately 250,000.
After 2004, the immigration trend appeared consistent till the end of timeline, however, emigration experienced a sharp decline between 2006 and 2007 from 400,000 to about 350,000. It recovered rapidly between 2007 to 2008 when proportion of population escalated to around 450,000 people. However, the net migration after 2004 returned to 200,000 until 2006, regained its momentum in 2007 but declined to exactly where it started from in 2008.
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34554973822 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64392203557 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638743455497 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.556985969 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129634762012 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597071628989 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520631493855 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102812696758 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052777391954 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.