Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed
The given map details two possible locations to develop a new shopping mall in the city of Brand Field.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although both the sites will be in proximity to the city center, the latter location will get away from the housing society.
According to the given illustration, the first site is proposed beside the housing estate in the North, just to the left of the River that runs through the city. In addition, the City Center, which is in the middle of the map, will be easily accessible via main Road and railway services. Moreover, to the extreme West, there lies a beautiful golf course and an adjacent park.
Turning to the other side, despite good connectivity through road and railways, the other side is quite further from the housing estate to the southern end. However, its distance from the city center is almost the same as of the first site. Furthermore, whilst the Industrial Estate is just across the railway track, the golf course and Park in the west will be a little further as compared to the first site.
- 87
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- Universities should offer equal opportunities to males and females on the education front To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76063829787 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39427295977 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1229507646 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150853665534 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728814070225 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750802898347 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113719176566 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077713376227 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.