birth rate
The line graph illustrates nativity rate in China and USA which is displayed over 80 years from 1920 until 2000. Units are described by percentages.
Overall, the birth rate of both country are decrease over the time of observation, while mostly USA surpass China in terms of the number of children delivered. In the beginning of period, USA had higher rates than China which was overtaken by China in 1933 and 1950, however USA come back to outperform China until 2000 with larger gap.
With regards to the exact percentage of birth rate, USA had higher rate with approximately 11% and the dive in 1940 up to 5% before rise again to its peak with 15%. On the other hand, the number of birth rate in China only slightly below USA from start point with 10% and reached its lowest point in 1940 up to 5% and remain stable for 5 years. Five years letter, China rate dramatically skyrocketing up to 20% and surpass USA nativity rate, however it slump again below USA until 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | phadode | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
- The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. 61
- the internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 78
- Falling of Educational Standard 61
- Lower Quality of Education 56
- Leisure Activities of Europian Adults 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Units are described by percentages. Overall, the birth rate of both country ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orm China until 2000 with larger gap. With regards to the exact percentage of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'slumps'?
Suggestion: slumps
...d surpass USA nativity rate, however it slump again below USA until 2000
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34853666989 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1030134657 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308432039565 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153814405672 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09241140872 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204842961358 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937052831347 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.