British students at one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010
The pie chart given below illustrates british scholar at one college in England who were capable to disparate articulate in extension to english in 2000 and 2010. It can be seen that five from six additional language saw a fluctuation excluding German language. That was registered a period of stability. But there was highest dramatic failed for student who are not able to speak additional language. It is measured by percentage.
From 2000, spanish was the highest additional language which British students spoken reach 30%. French extension language spoken by british student was higher for 5% than percentage from student spoken german. The comparison was 15% for French and 10 % for German. 15% british scholar mastered another language and 10% others are able to adapt two other languages. As 20% populations of them are not commanded other languages.
In 2010, the population of students who do not have to speak capability additional language refered an enormous declined from 20% to 10% and scholar who owned spoken french reduced gradually by 5% populations, from 15% to 10%. There was increased significantly from 30% to 35% for populations of scholar who capable spoken spanish language. While, student qualification for another language grew slightly from 15% to 20%. And for scholar who are competent spoken two other language saw a considerable climb around 5% from 10% to 15% between 2000 and 2010. There was only one remain stable percentage of the student who speak german, stable 10% while five years
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 61
- Average CO2 Emissions per person in the Uk, sweden, italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017 61
- US spending patterns between 1996 and 1996 78
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...stered a period of stability. But there was highest dramatic failed for student who are not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... are able to adapt two other languages. As 20% populations of them are not command...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18218623482 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73114575371 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502024291498 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3633707509 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363111022771 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124097295649 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970865737668 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278459898219 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770016996502 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.